The 36.9% Margin Illusion: What OTA Economics Actually Look Like
Booking Holdings reports 36.9% EBITDA margins. Most operators see strength. Systems thinkers see a margin structure that brands can replicate without the customer acquisition cost.

Simon te Hennepe
Founder & CEO, TRAVLR

The 36.9% Margin Illusion
Booking Holdings closed 2025 with a 36.9% EBITDA margin on $26.9 billion in revenue. That number gets quoted in every travel investor deck as proof of OTA dominance.
But strip it back.
What Most Operators Miss
That margin sits on top of $186.1 billion in gross bookings. The take rate is roughly 14.4%. Meaning for every $100 a traveller spends, Booking captures $14.40 and keeps $5.32 after costs.
Now consider a bank or retailer embedding travel directly. Their customer acquisition cost is zero — the customer already exists. Their distribution cost is zero — the channel is already built. Their data cost is zero — they already own the transaction history.
The Commercial Implication
The OTA margin structure is not a moat. It is a tax on distribution. And it only holds as long as brands keep renting access to their own customers.
When a bank embeds travel and captures even a 10% take rate, their effective margin is higher than Booking's because their cost base is fundamentally different.
What Smart Operators Should Do
Stop benchmarking against OTA margins. Start benchmarking against your own cost of customer access. If you already own the relationship, you already own the margin. The infrastructure to capture it is the only missing piece.
90% of Booking's accommodation business comes from repeat and direct customers. That is not loyalty. That is habit. And habits can be redirected.

Simon te Hennepe
Founder & CEO, TRAVLR · Embedded Travel Commerce · Loyalty Economics · Margin Architecture